SERVE Home Page
SERVE Center for Continuous Improvement
  Overview
  Products and Publications
  Professional Development
  Tools and Resources
Education Leadership Program
 
 
 

  

Topic Areas Emerging Issues About SERVE
SERVE > Topic Areas > Educator Quality > Educator Growth > Beginning Teacher Growth

 

 
Beginning Teacher Growth and Assessment

SERVE developed the Teacher Growth and Assessment model for use in evaluating experienced teachers (those with four or more years of classroom teaching experience). As such, the expectations for performance were purposefully set above "minimum competency" to capture the complexity of the skills and knowledge of the experienced practitioner. Districts implementing the SERVE Teacher Growth and Assessment model quickly realized the value of clearly communicating expectations of performance coupled with resources to meet these expectations. Yet the model as designed presented intentionally unrealistic expectations for those novice teachers just entering the field. In an effort to "grow" new teachers, SERVE modified the Teacher Growth and Assessment model by creating a graduated system of accountability. Since the assessment matrix is aligned with the INTASC standards, SERVE selected 12 performance dimensions that would capture all 10 INTASC standards while also addressing those key areas identified by practitioners and the current literature as those areas most crucial to the support of new teachers. In this system, the first-year teacher works closely with an experienced mentor to ensure proficiency in these 12 dimensions while beginning development in the remaining 10 dimensions. The evaluator holds the first-year teacher accountable for performance in these 12 areas while withholding judgment on the remaining 10.

 


During the second year in the classroom, an additional seven dimensions are added to the accountability level. The second-year teacher continues to work closely with the mentor to develop these crucial skills and is now assessed by the evaluator on 19 of the 22 skills. The remaining 3 (long-range planning and sequencing, pacing, and analysis of assessment) require additional development and practice before inclusion into the summative evaluation.

At the conclusion of the third year, the teacher is now ready to be assessed on the full matrix. By building practice carefully with the support of a mentor teacher who is focusing efforts on the targeted dimensions, this system of graduated accountability has strengthened the new teacher's practice and confidence. It further recognizes that teaching is not a profession that can be entered at the same level of expectation and responsibility as more experienced colleagues.